The cry of pain, today launched him on facebook Connect a very active network, complaining that, ev

which roughly can be translated: "Diodorus goes to the courts, or Flacco, and gout. But nothing pays the lawyer, and this is gout in the hands "(in colour blind test practice, what we now call" stingy colour blind test ").
The cry of pain, today launched him on facebook Connect a very active network, complaining that, even against it, you are ultimately multiplying requests for assistance gratis et amore Dei, and that even though he is a lawyer available and without thinking hard the parcel, he noticed that customers are treated well and with fairness, if they take advantage. We add the Connects, we must be careful to do everything colour blind test within the prescribed period to protect their rights (and, I might add, to meet deadlines often we anticipate our pocket a lot of money: colour blind test notifications, stamps, unified colour blind test contribution, brand for enrollment in the role, postage, photocopying, in addition to tram tickets, phone calls, faxes, consumption soles of shoes and pads for the headache) while they do not always make disbursements in the time allowed (indeed I would add, are very often not even touched by the idea that you have to pay the lawyer).
This could possibly stand in the old days, when lawyers before the court Principles, Principles were in toto, that is, the wealthy heirs of substantial assets, they could afford, in the great mass of their remunerative work, because even some pro bono . It was part of the scene, contributed to the "fame of sanctity" of the character at a time when the word "marketing" had not even been invented: that looks great man, the lawyer so and so, he defended for free a poor man who had suffered an injustice!
Oh God, not always was so. A lawyer today octogenarian, who in his youth was for some time collaborator of the great Francesco Carnelutti, told me this episode. One day he had the honor of accompanying Prof. Carnelutti a hearing outside Milan. During the return journey by train, a gentleman who was sitting in the same compartment, having these two characters with the air of lawyers, had held that confirmation of the profession, he asked for an opinion on a certain issue and Prof. Carnelutti gave him, verbally, some advice. Arriving at the station in Milan, said goodbye and then a young co-worker thought it was all over there. But a few days later he was told by the "Master" (as he called himself the lawyer. Carnelutti its contributors): "Remember colour blind test that we have to send the bill to the gentleman." Probably we would all have to learn - and not just for legal issues, but also for the lessons of practical life! - By Francis Carnelutti.
Today, as he writes the praiseworthy Connect in facebook, we lawyers are workers that we get up every day and go to work like everyone else, we also support our costs, we often do much more than 8 hours a day and we have great responsibility. But it seems that no one cares about this. Sacrosanct words! And customers have the knife by the handle, so sometimes assume an attitude of arrogance towards us unspeakable.
The collection now I know. The large company, it will pass the job but maybe you will pay dad died, it makes you realize that the tail of lawyers out the door, if these conditions do not go well and greets you on the next. The small customer (which at the "closing" to pay good money on the nail and the notary and accountant, without saying a word and the mere sight of the respective parcels, under your nose that, to get to the signing of the deed, you have made ac *** like a monkey for months and months arguing colour blind test with the other party on the one hand, and to make the customer understand that accepting the transaction is cheaper than going forward 10 years and due to the other) to you, if it goes well, pays half of what you had stated in notula, perhaps claiming, without any evidence, that one day you would have estimated that the lower figure. The colleague colour blind test out of district colour blind test asking you if you can home with you for a cause, you, you need to work, the answer yes, unfortunate, and you find yourself having to make heavy obligations (access to the registries, checks, deposits, additions of stamps / unified insufficient contributions, copies of acts of the counterparty, code) to participate in hearings in which you bring your face and your name in front of a Judge of that face and that name will be remembered, by supporting bizarre thesis (not to say the least) is not yours, but the fruit of the fertile imagination of the lord that it is quiet at his village ... and then eventually send the parcel, no pay, and the dominus laconically colour blind test tells you that prover