Currently, in the United States 40% of men, female respondents, 60% in this case is set off, the UN

It seems, looks in the mirror of what we want to see the difference between what we see in growing. osteopenia This is the only source of difference, not body measurements tend to change than in the past; changing values and aesthetic point of view the large share. Last 50-60 years, major changes in the shape and size of the human body was. People as they are now longer than before, thanks to the relative inactivity osteopenia and snacking and consumption more rounded lines. "Ideal osteopenia body" concept, if not reflect the current reality.
Considering especially the western osteopenia societies, now's rounded, average men and women can be considered collectively, osteopenia the idols of today's far past time to reflect on the more sought after features.
As confirmed in the comfort of grandparents, today's youngsters are longer than the old one for sure. Even in industrialized countries, it is known that the elongation process continued for decades. In height at the top of the list for now in Dutch, this extension osteopenia trend started in the mid-19th century. 1965, which is 1.78 meters in height for males in 1997 was observed to be increased to 6 cm. The shorter length of the average European country said the same trend. However, this growth rate is decreasing in European, Eastern European countries and in Japan seems to protect itself. This is what underlies the different trends? Experts everything better nutrition to the diet or the binding of the job is to oversimplify say. It seems that the most important thing, the growth rate of the first one or two years. During this period, you would have reached adulthood sets the size, and everything depends on what the Fed is not completely osteopenia well. The first few years of life, which is the highest growth rate of the period; especially in the long bones of the legs. If the leg length of the largest determinant of final height. Positive socio-economic conditions as a result of the return of good nutrition and the like, which have contributed to the faster growth of the baby a reality. After World War 2 the Japanese in the period of rapid socio-economic development, it is one of the best examples. Another key factor in health. Before the advent of modern antibiotics and vaccines on the scene, they spent infections, significantly slow down the growth of the baby was one of the factors. Of course, genetic factors also need to remember that.
Environmental impacts, as well as height which has the effect of weight. And it seems, has increased considerably in the average human weight. This increase depends on a certain percentage increase in length. Therefore, the weight to be regarded as independent of the length of the "body-mass index" (body-mass index - BMI) tested and utilized when calculating the value of any benefits from the ideal weight is.
way of finding BMI, weight, divide by the square of your length of pull in meters. 18.5 's under the weight of a value below normal, 18.5 to 24.9 to a value between normal weight, 25 to 29.9 between obesity, the obesity of 30 and above, or pointing to obesity. Obesity, especially in the western world started to increase at a tremendous pace, if not new information. According to the World Health currently over 1 billion people in the world fat, up to 300 million of them obese class located in the. However, BMI, according to researchers shows only one side of the coin. fiişmanlık or obesity, osteopenia defined and measured in a different way if the table suddenly believe they can get a lot worse.
the problems created by BMI, fat distribution in the body that can not explain; , the oil, the distribution is considered as one of the important determinants of health status. For example, too much fat in the upper part of the abdomen of those developing Type 2 diabetes and the likelihood osteopenia that carries harmful fats in the blood, resulting in a higher risk of developing heart disease.
The human waist circumference, in determining the amount of fat in the abdomen is thought to provide the data quite useful. Mercer University osteopenia School of Medicine in the United States, a study conducted regarding U.S. citizens, between 1960 and 2000, the waist circumference of 10 cm for men, women, almost 23 cm up 'dash' that has been revealed. Measure the waist circumference over 88 cm and having the "stomach area of obesity, defined as" the state they represent.
Currently, in the United States 40% of men, female respondents, 60% in this case is set off, the UN method arising from the 28% (men) and 34% (women) values, a much more optimistic picture they create in the middle.
After all, even if you have a normal BMI, especially abdominal fat, depending on the region osteopenia can be exposed to the risk of disease. Another point which attracted the attention of researchers, what 'aldığımız more than what' we need to hear verdiğimiz's concern. The resulting findings, waist size and skin thickness determined by the extent of the obesity, BMI '